What Mining Data Is Available in ViaBTC Mining Statistics?
ViaBTC Mining Statistics can show miners how much computing power their workers submit, how that hashrate changes over time, how rewards are calculated, and how earnings are paid. ViaBTC currently supports PPS+ and PPLNS settlement, with published fee rates of 4% and 2% respectively. Its mining tools also use inputs such as coin price, network difficulty, pool fee rate, and valid hashrate to estimate daily output. In 2026, these figures are useful for checking whether hardware performance, pool earnings, and payment records remain consistent over the same period.
ViaBTC Mining Statistics cover several layers of pool data rather than one single number. A miner can review hashrate, worker status, earnings, payment information, and related pool figures, while ViaBTC also provides real-time hashrate monitoring, alerts, worker groups, and watcher functions.
Hashrate is usually the first figure to check. It shows the computing power being submitted by miners, and it can be reviewed at both account and worker level. A farm with 100 machines rated at 200 TH/s has a nominal capacity of 20 PH/s, but a lower pool-side average can show that some machines are offline, underperforming, or not submitting work normally.
Historical hashrate is more useful than one reading taken at 1:00 p.m. A short-term change of 3% may come from normal estimation variance, while a repeated 3%–5% decline across several hours deserves a closer look at worker status, network stability, power supply, and miner settings.
Worker data adds the machine-level view. ViaBTC recommends checking miner and hashrate details through the pool interface, and its BTC mining guidance says that miners can review operation status and profits after a newly connected miner has been stable for around 10–15 minutes.
For example, an operator managing 100 workers may see total hashrate fall from 10 PH/s to 9.2 PH/s. If 8 workers are inactive, the operator can compare their combined rated capacity with the missing 0.8 PH/s instead of treating the entire farm as one unit.
Share-related data provides another layer. Pool mining works through submitted shares, and ViaBTC calculates PPS+ block-reward payments from shares, difficulty, block reward, and the applicable pool fee. Under the published 2026 terms, PPS+ uses a 4% fee for the PPS portion, while transaction-fee rewards use PPLNS treatment.
A simple example shows why share data matters. If 1,000,000 shares are submitted and 10,000 are rejected or otherwise fail to become valid work, the affected share ratio is 1%; at 30,000 out of the same 1,000,000 submissions, it reaches 3%. A rise from 1% to 3% can warrant checking network latency, miner configuration, or hardware stability.
Earnings statistics then connect computing work with cryptocurrency output. ViaBTC states that PPS+ mining yield consists of block rewards and transaction fees, while PPLNS uses the miner's hashrate share and the reward generated by the pool. Under PPLNS, ViaBTC states that allocation is based on hashrate share during the previous 5 difficulty rounds after a block reaches 6 confirmations.
This distinction affects how numbers should be read. A miner using PPS+ may see hourly settlement based on the current difficulty, while PPLNS income can vary with actual blocks and fee income. Comparing one hour of PPS+ income with one short PPLNS period can produce a misleading result, especially when the sample contains only 1–2 blocks.
| Data | What it shows | Useful check |
|---|---|---|
| Hashrate | Submitted computing power | Compare with machine capacity |
| Worker status | Active or inactive miners | Find machines affecting pool output |
| Shares | Submitted mining work | Review submission quality |
| Earnings | Estimated or settled output | Compare with hashrate and period |
| Payments | Funds distributed from the pool | Reconcile account records |
The time period must stay consistent when these figures are compared. If average hashrate is measured over 24 hours but earnings are taken from only 6 hours, the numbers describe different samples. A cleaner check uses the same interval, such as 24 hours in 2026, then compares average hashrate, worker uptime, earnings, and payments for that same window.
ViaBTC's calculator provides another useful data point. The current calculator accepts coin, price, difficulty, PPS fee rate, and valid hashrate, then produces an estimated daily earning figure. The live interface lists BTC, BCH, LTC, ZEC, DASH, and KAS as selectable coins.
A miner can use the ViaBTC Mining Calculator to compare a planned or observed hashrate with a theoretical daily result. For instance, if a 500 TH/s setup produces an estimate for one difficulty level, the same 500 TH/s can be tested again after a 10% difficulty change to see how sensitive the projected output is.
The calculator should not be treated as a fixed income figure. ViaBTC says its estimate depends on current conditions and can differ from actual results because of the payment method, mining difficulty, transaction fees, and pool luck. Its own 2026 guidance also describes the calculator as a scenario-testing tool rather than a forecast of future earnings.
Network difficulty is another field that needs to be read alongside hashrate. ViaBTC notes that difficulty generally changes over time, so a miner can keep the same hashrate and still receive a different amount of cryptocurrency. A 5% increase in difficulty, for example, can reduce theoretical output when other conditions remain similar.
Halving is another reason historical data matters. If a protocol reduces its block reward, the same mining equipment can produce fewer coins without any hardware change. For a year-over-year comparison, a miner should therefore record the coin, hashrate, difficulty, settlement method, and reward conditions rather than comparing only the final coin amount.
Payment records complete the picture after earnings have been recorded. ViaBTC currently lists four withdrawal methods, including auto withdrawal, normal transfer, inter-user transfer, and transfer to CoinEx; its help center states that auto withdrawal has zero withdrawal fee and is processed daily between 10:00 and 18:00 UTC+8.
For accounting, a miner can compare three stages: mining output, settled earnings, and funds received. A 2026 monthly record containing 30 daily observations can show whether a change came from lower hashrate, different network conditions, the selected payment method, or the timing of settlement and withdrawal.
A practical review can use four numbers first: average hashrate, active-worker percentage, earnings per unit of hashrate, and paid amount.
For a 100-worker farm, moving from 97 active workers to 92 means the active-worker rate falls from 97% to 92%, giving the operator a clear point for further inspection.
This approach also helps with hardware comparisons. Suppose two models each operate for 30 days, with one averaging 180 TH/s and another 200 TH/s. If the higher-rated model spends 8% of the period offline while the lower-rated model remains available for 99% of the period, pool statistics may show a much smaller practical difference than the nameplate hashrates suggest.
ViaBTC also provides miner profitability rankings with data such as hashrate, power, and 24-hour net profit for different models and coins. That allows a miner to place pool performance beside hardware specifications, although electricity price and local operating costs still need to be assessed separately.
For routine monitoring, a daily record with 7 observations can be enough to spot repeated changes, while a 30-day dataset gives a better view of sustained performance. Keeping the same units, time windows, coin, and settlement method makes those comparisons easier to interpret and reduces errors caused by mixing unrelated figures.